Laptop Screen Extenders Could Be Great, If They Weren't So Expensive. And Heavy. And Weird.

"Due to the weight of the extended displays, you have to tilt your laptop screen slightly backward so that the kickstand can help support it. When you fully extend the displays to be flush with your laptop's monitor, the corners of your screens are suddenly 2 feet away. But when you pull the edges of those monitors in, they start to angle upward because the entire laptop screen is tilted backward."

"Laptop screen extenders are also notably wide and can easily dominate a table meant to be shared at a library, airport, or other public place. Cheaper screen extenders have bad displays. When we tested a $300 Kefeya extender from Amazon, we found that the contrast was poor, and both of its screens were too dim even for some indoor situations. They didn't clip securely to our laptop, either."

"The good ones are heavy, bulky, and expensive. There were a few tested models we that we actually liked, including the Xebec Snap and the Monduo 14 Inch Pro Duo. Xebec's Snap system has that unique modular design, while the Monduo extender's displays offer better brightness, a higher resolution, and a higher refresh rate. But the Snap system costs about $1,100 for the bracket and two screens, and the Monduo extender is $700. Both are bulky to transport, weighing about 4 to 5 pounds."

Laptop screen extenders add extra displays and a professional appearance but introduce major ergonomic problems and setup challenges. The weight of extended displays forces the laptop screen to tilt backward, causing edges to angle upward and requiring awkward neck tilting during prolonged use. Extenders are wide and can dominate shared tables in public spaces. Lower-cost models often suffer poor contrast, dim screens, and insecure clips, as exemplified by a disappointing $300 Kefeya unit. Higher-quality extenders deliver better brightness, resolution, and modular features but are heavy, bulky, and costly, often weighing 4–5 pounds and costing several hundred to over a thousand dollars.

Read at www.nytimes.com