The article delves into the ongoing debate about distinguishing AI-generated content from human-written works. The author reflects on their personal experience with this issue, noting an initial concern about AI's capabilities. However, they ultimately conclude that the method of creation is less important than the content’s effectiveness and accuracy. The article argues that whether content is generated by AI or a human writer, what truly matters is its trustworthiness and ability to fulfill its purpose, suggesting that humans still provide more authentic value in writing than AI does at the moment.
If it did, then did it matter if there was an AI assist? Now, I believe that at this moment, in the second quarter of 2025, humans will succeed in that goal more than AI will.
Ultimately, whether a piece was whipped up by a robot with a great prompt or painstakingly written letter by letter by a human doesn't matter. Here's what does: Is the piece accurate?
Collection
[
|
...
]