"It was bound to happen. The Darwin Awards are being extended to include examples of misadventures involving overzealous applications of AI. Nominations are open for the 2025 AI Darwin Awards and the list of contenders is growing, fueled by a tech world weary of AI and evangelists eager to shove it somewhere inappropriate. There's the Taco Bell drive-thru incident, where the chain catastrophically overestimated AI's ability to understand customer orders."
"Or the Replit moment, where a spot of vibe coding nuked a production database, despite instructions from the user not to fiddle with code without permission. Then there's the woeful security surrounding an AI chatbot used to screen applicants at McDonald's, where feeding in a password of 123456 gave access to the details of 64 million job applicants. The Darwin Awards have traditionally been handed out (in a virtual sense) to individuals who have managed to remove themselves from the gene pool."
An AI-focused extension of the Darwin Awards catalogs high-profile failures where careless AI deployment caused harm or embarrassment. Examples include a Taco Bell drive-thru where AI misunderstood orders, a Replit incident where automated coding actions erased a production database despite explicit instructions, and an insecure hiring chatbot at McDonald's exposing 64 million applicants through a trivial password. The initiative emphasizes that AI is a tool whose misuse, poor security, or absent safeguards produces preventable disasters. The awards aim to document organizational and engineering negligence rather than to mock the technology itself, promoting caution and accountability in AI applications.
Read at Theregister
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]