
"The iShares Russell 2000 ETF tracks the Russell 2000 index, which comprises the 2,000 smallest companies after the largest 1,000 have been excluded. There is no profitability requirement, and a company that has never earned a dollar of profit can sit inside this fund indefinitely as long as it meets the size criteria."
"Roughly 40% of the iShares Russell 2000 ETF's holdings are currently unprofitable. Currently, healthcare leads the sector mix at 17.56%, followed by industrials at 16.84%, financial services at 15.65%, and technology at 15.16%."
"The iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF tracks the S&P SmallCap 600, which requires demonstrated profitability, thus providing a different risk profile and performance trajectory compared to the Russell 2000 ETF."
In 2026, small-cap ETFs are performing better than expected, with the iShares Russell 2000 ETF up 2.26% and the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF up 4.53%. Both funds outperform the broader market, but they differ in methodology. The Russell 2000 ETF includes unprofitable companies, while the S&P Small-Cap ETF requires profitability. This distinction affects returns, risk profiles, and long-term performance, making it crucial for investors to understand the differences between the two funds.
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]