Bonta 'disappointed' by Supreme Court ruling on L.A. immigration raids
Briefly

Bonta 'disappointed' by Supreme Court ruling on L.A. immigration raids
""It's disappointing," he said. "And the emergency docket has been used more and more. You often don't know who has voted and how. There's no argument. There's no written opinion.""
""for ICE agents, federal immigration officers, to use race, the inability to speak English, location or perceived occupation to ... stop and detain, search, seize Californians.""
""very disturbing.""
California Attorney General Rob Bonta condemned a Supreme Court decision that permits immigration agents to stop and question people based on perceived race, language, location, or occupation. Bonta said such tactics can violate the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures. He aligned with ACLU claims challenging the administration's practices and warned that using race or perceived occupation enables potential discrimination. Bonta also criticized the Court's expanding use of the emergency docket for obscuring decision-making, noting lack of clarity about votes, arguments, and written opinions, and called Justice Kavanaugh's opinion very disturbing.
Read at Los Angeles Times
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]