"I've grown so accustomed to open-source software that when I'm on MacOS and find that I have to pay for something, it takes me aback. What? I have to pay for software? Also: Why open source may not survive the rise of generative AI At the same time, there are certain open-source applications I would pay for, GPL or not. Some of these software titles are just that good, while others I simply depend on."
"Docker makes it so easy to deploy apps and services that would otherwise be complicated or time-consuming to get running. When your daily dance card is already filled, you won't want to have to take the time to install a database server, create a database, install the dependencies, install the software, and then walk through the process of installing a reverse proxy so the app can be reached. Instead, run a Docker command, wait a few seconds, and access the service."
Long-term Linux use since 1997 resulted in paying for very few applications and strong familiarity with open-source software. Encountering paid MacOS applications can feel surprising to users accustomed to free alternatives. Certain open-source applications are worth paying for because they are exceptionally good or because users depend on them. Several standout open-source titles run on Linux, MacOS, and Windows. Docker simplifies deploying apps and services via containers, avoiding manual setup of databases, dependencies, and reverse proxies, and its convenience can justify payment. VirtualBox is another dependable, regularly relied-upon application.
Read at ZDNET
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]