Justice Jackson expressed serious concerns regarding a recent Supreme Court ruling, stating it offers a troubling precedent that may lead to unequal legal standards for different litigants. Specifically, she noted that while most parties must demonstrate significant harm to receive relief, the Government can obtain stays with minimal justification. This ruling, according to Jackson, significantly increases risks to the privacy of millions of Americans by loosening regulations protecting sensitive personal data managed by the Social Security Administration, potentially exposing issues related to identity theft and misuse of medical histories.
Jackson stated that this ruling offers a troubling indication that the court's legal standards may not be consistently applied to all litigants, highlighting unequal treatment.
According to Jackson, the Supreme Court ruling exposes 'grave privacy risks for millions of Americans' by jeopardizing sensitive personal data held by the Social Security Administration.
Collection
[
|
...
]