"What makes the seventh Ghostface mystery uniquely dispiriting is how openly afraid it is of its own history, audience, studio, and release. Marketed as a triumphant return to form and positioned as a nostalgic corrective move for Paramount after a year of public controversy, director Kevin Williamson's latest lands like a corporate gesture that misunderstands both the franchise he created and the horror landscape it inhabits now."
"But pricey reassurance can smother satire, and that's a key element both Scream and Williamson's career once thrived on. What the director delivers here, after writing the original film and two sequels, is a poorly constructed story that confuses reverence for relevance and repetition for insight."
Scream 7 represents a uniquely dispiriting entry in the horror franchise, not because it is poorly made, but because it openly fears its own history, audience, and studio pressures. Director Kevin Williamson's return to the series, marketed as a triumphant comeback, functions as a corporate gesture following Paramount's public controversies. The film brings back Sidney Prescott in a desperate attempt to distract from external conflicts, while facing protests over the dismissal of Scream 6 star Melissa Barrera. The script, co-written by Williamson, Guy Busick, and James Vanderbilt, confuses reverence with relevance and repetition with insight, abandoning the satire and self-awareness that once defined both the franchise and Williamson's career.
#scream-7-criticism #horror-franchise-decline #corporate-filmmaking #satire-and-relevance #sequel-legacy
Read at IndieWire
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]