"The study found that informal ties are a more relevant predictor of publication success than formal collaborations, even after controlling for various factors such as gender and institutional prestige."
"About a quarter of scholars were not mentioned in any acknowledgments and exhibited significantly lower publication success on standard citation metrics."
"Informal connections are described as a key predictor of publication impact, helping to form an 'invisible college' that allows scholars to draw advice from a broader range of colleagues."
"Access to these informal links is unevenly distributed, and such inequalities could reinforce stratification within academia."
A study reveals that being acknowledged in academic papers is a stronger predictor of publication success than co-authorship. Analyzing 20 years of political science papers, researchers found that informal ties significantly influence publication impact. About 25% of scholars not mentioned in acknowledgments had lower publication success. These informal connections create an 'invisible college' that provides social capital, enabling scholars to gain advice and feedback. However, access to these informal networks is uneven, potentially reinforcing academic stratification.
Read at Inside Higher Ed | Higher Education News, Events and Jobs
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]