The article discusses a legal dispute between Perkins Coie and the Trump administration regarding an executive order targeting the law firm. The DOJ contended that an injunction against the order would only be enforceable against specific agencies named in the lawsuit. In response, Perkins Coie amended their complaint to name every relevant federal agency, significantly increasing the scope of the case. This strategic legal maneuver was noted as an effective and clever response to the DOJ's argument, showcasing the law firm's adaptability in litigation.
In the case brought by Perkins Coie against the Trump administration, DOJ contends that an injunction applies only to the agencies specified in the complaint. Perkins Coie cleverly amended its complaint to include every relevant federal agency, resulting in a lengthy 40-page document.
The Department of Justice's position appears weakened in light of Perkins Coie's strategic move to name all relevant agencies in their amended complaint, shifting the legal landscape.
Collection
[
|
...
]