The Trump administration argued in court against California's request to halt military troop deployments in Los Angeles, emphasizing that judicial intervention could jeopardize federal agents' safety and violate the president's authority. The administration criticized the restraining order as a political maneuver, asserting that the troops are necessary to uphold immigration laws and protect federal interests. They contended that stopping troop deployments would be unconstitutional and dangerous, as it would undermine the enforcement of federal law amid ongoing protests against immigration policies.
The Trump administration argued in federal court that judicial intervention to stop military deployments to Los Angeles would endanger federal immigration agents.
Trump's attorneys described California's request for a restraining order as a "crass political stunt" that threatens American lives amid protests.
They argued that preventing the deployment would hinder the president's lawful power to protect federal facilities and enforce immigration laws.
The administration maintained that no 'rioters' veto' exists against enforcing federal law, asserting the President's right to deploy the National Guard.
Collection
[
|
...
]