"The research shows that for many who are diagnosed with PTSD, the condition arises not from what was done to us but what we did—or what we failed to prevent. This mechanism, known as moral injury, can be sympathetic ('I couldn't save them') but is often not sympathetic at all ('I killed them'). For people carrying this factor in PTSD, the task of integration, of sitting with and holding what we've done, is far more challenging."
"We are, once again, engaged in a war, despite the fact that Donald Trump campaigned on stopping American involvement in foreign wars. At the time of this writing, he has involved us in three to five separate armed conflicts, depending on how you count them. With Iran, Trump may be gesturing at ending the conflict for the cameras (and the stock markets), but Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth quickly cast doubt on the idea that there will be a quick end to the fighting."
Military service involves exposure to traumatic events, but research reveals that many PTSD cases stem not from threats experienced but from moral injury—guilt over actions taken or prevented. This distinction matters significantly for recovery, as moral injury involves confronting personal responsibility rather than victimization. The current era features increased U.S. military interventions globally alongside rising domestic civil unrest and political violence. Understanding moral injury's role in PTSD is crucial for supporting veterans who must integrate and process their own actions during service, a psychologically demanding task distinct from processing external trauma.
Read at Slate Magazine
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]