"As a result of that move, the damage from the latest emails is likely to be limited to Mountbatten-Windsor, said Craig Prescott, an expert on constitutional law and the monarchy at Royal Holloway, University of London. The documents show that "they had to do something to separate Andrew from the rest of the family, and the nuclear option was the clearest way of doing it," Prescott said. "And as more comes out, then you do feel that they have been justified.""
"The revelations come three months after King Charles III stripped Andrew of his royal titles, including the right to be called a prince, as he tried to insulate the monarchy from a steady stream of stories about his younger brother's relationship with Epstein that has tarnished the royal family for more than a decade. The former prince is now known simply as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor."
U.S. Justice Department documents in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation include an invitation for Epstein to dine at Buckingham Palace, Epstein's offer to introduce his correspondent to a 26-year-old Russian woman, and photos that appear to show Andrew kneeling over an unidentified person lying on the floor. King Charles III stripped Andrew of royal titles and the right to be called a prince, and the former prince now uses the name Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Legal and constitutional experts say the family's move to separate Mountbatten-Windsor limits damage to the monarchy while the documents raise serious questions about his judgment and elite private conduct.
Read at ABC7 Los Angeles
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]