During oral arguments for the case Mahmoud v. Taylor, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson highlighted parental choice in education, particularly regarding LGBTQ-inclusive curricula in schools. The Montgomery County school board's program aims to teach young children about gender identity through storybooks, sparking debates over appropriateness and potential indoctrination. Critics, including a group of religious parents, argue that the curriculum conflicts with their values, raising concerns about external influences on children's understanding of sexuality and the responsibility of parents to guide their development.
"During oral arguments in the case of Mahmoud v. Taylor, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson unintentionally made a practical and convincing case for universal school choice."
"Even secular parents should find the idea of strangers teaching their prepubescent children about sexuality and gender dysphoria at such a young age and in such a frivolous manner unacceptable."
Collection
[
|
...
]