Learning Management Systems were traditionally seen as essential tools in Learning and Development strategies, effectively managing content and tracking user engagement. However, many LMSs lack the capability to demonstrate true impact on business performance, focusing more on activities rather than outcomes. Stakeholders demand clear evidence of how learning translates to improved results, pinpointing a disconnect in current LMS functionalities. The misconception that completion rates equate to effectiveness has emerged, creating an illusion of progress while actual behavior change may not align with logged activities.
For years, organizations have leaned heavily on Learning Management Systems as the hub of their L&D strategy.
Most LMSs weren't designed to show impact. They're designed to show activity.
CEOs, COOs, and stakeholders want to know how L&D drives performance. They want to see evidence.
We've confused accessibility with effectiveness. Yes, LMSs made learning easier to roll out, but this created an illusion of progress.
#learning-management-systems #business-impact #performance-measurement #learning-and-development #effectiveness
Collection
[
|
...
]