The Hidden Costs of a Product Recall | Entrepreneur

"For entrepreneurs, few events are more damaging than a product recall. The immediate image is always financial: refunds, fines and settlements. But anyone who has been inside these cases knows the true cost runs far deeper. Recalls erode consumer trust, unravel years of brand building and expose systemic failures in leadership. I have seen firsthand how these crises unfold. In nearly every instance, the warning signs were there."

"Consider Peloton. The company faced reports of injuries and even the tragic death of a child linked to its Tread+ treadmill. Instead of acting swiftly, Peloton resisted recalling the product. That decision led to one of the largest penalties in Consumer Product Safety Commission history. Peloton paid $19 million for failing to immediately report defects. The fine was only part of the story. The brand damage continues to ripple years later."

"Other cases may not grab as many headlines but still leave lasting scars. Ninja recalled hundreds of thousands of pressure cookers after reports of severe burns. Portable blenders were pulled from the market after blades came loose during operation. Werner ladders were recalled when they broke without warning. In every case, the cost of waiting outweighed the cost of acting early."

Product recalls inflict deep financial, legal and reputational damage beyond immediate refunds, fines and settlements. Recalls erode consumer trust, unravel years of brand equity and reveal systemic leadership failures. Warning signs often precede crises: known risks, employee concerns and consumer complaints are frequently raised and then ignored while leadership waits. Delays magnify harm, increase injuries and escalate lawsuits. High-profile examples include Peloton's Tread+ linked to injuries and a child's death, resulting in a $19 million CPSC penalty, and Onewheel facing lawsuits over sudden stopping incidents. The cost of waiting often exceeds the cost of acting early.

Read at Entrepreneur