HOKA Rocket X 3 vs HOKA Rocket X 2

"The Rocket X 3 has a dual-density PEBA midsole with a softer PEBA on the top and a firmer PEBA on the bottom. It has a soft ride compared to other super shoes and it has a high level of energy return. The Rocket X 2 has the same midsole setup as the X 3 however its midsole foams are firmer. This means that during transitions, your feet don't sink down into the midsole as much and it results in a faster ride."

"The carbon plate in the X 3 has been redesigned. It has a wing that extends out on the lateral side and it feels more flexible than the plate in the X 2. The stiffer plate of the X 2 provides more propulsion (it feels more snappy) and it increases the rocker effect. The X 2 has a more prominent rocker thanks to its stiffer forefoot and its firmer ride. This makes transitions feel faster."

"When it comes to stability, the Rocket X 3 feels more stable. It has a wider base so foot strikes feel more planted. It also has the redesigned carbon plate which offers more stability and support. The outsole durability of the X 2 is better than the X 3. This is because its midsole foam is firmer, which makes it more resilient and more resistant to scratches and chips."

HOKA's Rocket X is a marathon racer with HOKA's best midsole foam and a full-length carbon plate; both versions cost $250. The Rocket X 3 has a dual-density PEBA midsole with a softer top and firmer bottom, yielding a softer ride and high energy return. The Rocket X 2 shares the midsole architecture but uses firmer foams, resulting in less sink, a firmer push-off platform, and faster transitions. The X 3's redesigned carbon plate with a lateral wing feels more flexible and stable; the X 2's stiffer plate gives snappier propulsion and a more pronounced rocker. The X 2 also has better outsole durability. The X 3 offers a more padded, comfortable upper.

Read at Runningshoesguru