Mayor Lurie's charter reform would enable him to remake City Hall

"Experienced government hands often liken tinkering with the charter to brain surgery. A more apt metaphor, however, might be entering into a marriage: The consequences (likely) aren't fatal if you make a mess of it, but, for the sake of everyone's sanity, well-being and bank account, you'd really want to do your due diligence and get it right."

"Altering the charter can induce profound consequences with ramifications that can carry on for years and cannot be easily reversed. But, separate and apart from the substance of the mayor's proposals, let the record show that: Lurie is gathering signatures to enact a ballot measure that will make it harder for you to gather signatures to enact a ballot measure."

"He is doing this in the name of fostering greater cooperation between the mayor and Board of Supervisors - but Lurie is choosing to bypass the Board of Supervisors and go straight to the voters, at great monetary expense."

Mayor Daniel Lurie has filed papers to place three charter reform measures on the November ballot to reshape San Francisco's government structure. Charter modifications carry significant long-term consequences that are difficult to reverse, requiring careful deliberation. Lurie's approach presents contradictions: he is gathering signatures to make it harder for others to gather signatures for ballot measures, cluttering the ballot to prevent future clutter, and pursuing this through direct voter appeal rather than working with the Board of Supervisors despite claiming to foster greater cooperation between these bodies. The proposals contain substantial provisions that even participants in the charter reform working group were unaware of, raising concerns about transparency and public understanding of the measures.

Read at Mission Local