During the trial of Jozef Puska and his family, the defense lawyers argued that sisters-in-law Jozefina Grundzova and Viera Gaziova did not know that Puska had committed murder when they burned his clothes. They emphasized that the women’s actions stemmed from ignorance rather than complicity. The closing arguments highlighted the need for the jury to consider the sisters-in-law's perspective and their lack of awareness regarding the severity of Puska's actions at the time of the incident, presenting a defense centered on their innocence despite the circumstances surrounding the murder of Ashling Murphy.
The defense lawyers argued that Jozef Puska's sisters-in-law, Jozefina Grundzova and Viera Gaziova, acted without knowledge of any wrongdoing when they burned clothes linked to the murder.
In a compelling closing argument, the defense insisted that the sisters-in-law could not fathom the gravity of Puska's actions as they destroyed the evidence, emphasizing their ignorance on the matter.
Collection
[
|
...
]