Prince Harry's legal challenge for police protection in Britain has ended unfavorably, as the Court of Appeal upheld the government's decision to revoke his security following his departure from royal duties in 2020. The argument centered on the withdrawal of royal protection being unlawful and a threat to his family's safety. Harry's bid to self-finance security measures was declined by the involved committee, which asserted that private payments could hinder the available pool of trained officers. This ongoing legal saga reflects the complexities of maintaining royal security in changing circumstances.
Harry's legal battle with the British government over security funding culminated in a court ruling denying him automatic police protection, highlighting concerns over royal security post-regency.
The court found that the decision to withdraw Prince Harry's police protection after he stepped down from royal duties was consistent with official policy and legal standards.
Harry's offer to cover his own security costs was rejected by the Executive Committee, which stated that allowing such arrangements could jeopardize limited resources for close protection.
The appeal focused on whether the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty violated its policy, marking another chapter in Harry's ongoing legal struggles regarding his family's safety.
Collection
[
|
...
]