Ingenious?Orwellian? Or both? Supreme Court considers constitutionality of 'geofence' warrants
Briefly

Ingenious?Orwellian? Or both? Supreme Court considers constitutionality of 'geofence' warrants
"Geofencing allows the government to draw a virtual fence around a geographic area where a crime was committed, seeking a warrant to require a tech company to search its data."
"The technique relies on a Google feature called 'location history,' which records users' locations every two minutes, pinpointing their whereabouts if their phone is active."
"At the time this case began in 2019, about one-third of all Google users, approximately 500 million people, had opted into using the location service."
"The focal point of the case is the Fourth Amendment's ban on unreasonable searches, requiring police to obtain a warrant issued by a neutral magistrate."
The Supreme Court is hearing arguments regarding geofencing, a law enforcement technique that enables police to access tech firm databases to identify individuals near a crime scene. This method involves drawing a virtual boundary around the crime location and obtaining a warrant to require tech companies to search their data for users within that area. The case raises questions about the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and the implications of using location data from services like Google, which tracks users' movements.
Read at www.npr.org
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]