A Judge Was Found Guilty of Obstructing ICE. That's Not the Most Farcical Part.
Briefly

A Judge Was Found Guilty of Obstructing ICE. That's Not the Most Farcical Part.
"A Wisconsin jury found state court Judge Hannah Dugan guilty of obstructing federal immigration enforcement on Thursday, delivering a victory to the Trump administration's crusade against anyone-even judicial officers-who attempt to impede its mass deportation campaign. Dugan, a Milwaukee County Circuit Judge, helped a noncitizen evade ICE agents at the state courthouse by instructing him to exit the courtroom through a specific door. Agents apprehended him anyway, and prosecutors promptly charged Dugan with obstruction, a felony punishable by up to five years' imprisonment."
"We are living in a world in which the Supreme Court has granted sweeping criminal immunity to presidents-specifically, to Donald Trump-for actions that they take that fall anywhere within the "outer perimeter" of their "official responsibilities." SCOTUS simply made that rule up in Trump v. United States. Yet there is a realdoctrine of judicial immunity that has deep roots in American law. It provides an absolute shield against prosecution of judges for all actions taken in their official capacity."
A Wisconsin jury found Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan guilty of obstructing federal immigration enforcement. Prosecutors allege Dugan directed a noncitizen to leave the courtroom through a side door to evade ICE agents; agents detained the individual and charged Dugan with felony obstruction, punishable by up to five years. The Supreme Court recently recognized a broad criminal-immunity doctrine for presidents in Trump v. United States. Judicial immunity traditionally shields judges for official acts, including courtroom directions, creating a legal dissonance between presidential and judicial accountability.
Read at Slate Magazine
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]