"And I think it is a sign of a culture that has where political discourse has soured beyond control and something that we need to really pull back. I mean, obviously, well, I assume that the person who murdered Charlie Kirk was mentally ill, but nonetheless, you know, to create a culture in which political discourse can lead to political violence is unacceptable in the United States."
"A good argument involves logic and a search for truth. A quarrel is an effort to tear down your sparring partner. Sparring with intellectual opponents is the way to hear the other side. Shunning others just because they disagree with you is also a recipe for a lonely and ultimately unhappy life."
Amy Coney Barrett called the murder of Charlie Kirk horrific and a sobering tragedy for his family and the nation, framing it as a symptom of soured political discourse. Barrett suggested the suspect may have been mentally ill but stressed that fostering a culture where political rhetoric leads to violence is unacceptable. Barrett invoked G.K. Chesterton’s distinction between argument and quarrel, urging reasoned debate and engagement with intellectual opponents to avoid isolation. Barrett expressed hope that the assassination might prompt societal reflection and a renewed commitment to civil political engagement.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]