"In the wake of this disturbing tragedy, a maelstrom of finger-pointing and recrimination surged through social media, raising the core temperature of a divided America amid an already markedly tense year. While some, like President Trump, were quick to paint the outspoken Kirk as a martyr for free speech, supporters of the slain provocateur began demanding consequences for those speaking freely about Kirk in ways that they deemed inappropriate. In the name of free speech, people had to be punished for exercising it."
"High-profile right-wing influencers like Laura Loomer and Chaya Raichik (better known as LibsofTikTok), surfaced social media posts that either celebrated Kirk's death or appeared close enough to it to draw their ire. The Federalist, a conservative online magazine, ran an aggregated list entitled, "'Hope The Bullet's Okay': Here Are The Demonic Reactions From Leftists To Charlie Kirk Assassination," giving bereft readers a focal point on which to train their outrage."
A suspect in custody allegedly shot and killed Charlie Kirk, cofounder and star attraction of Turning Point USA. Social media erupted with finger-pointing and recrimination, intensifying an already divisive and tense national atmosphere. President Trump and others cast Kirk as a martyr for free speech, while supporters demanded consequences for those whose posts seemed to celebrate or mock his death. Right-wing influencers surfaced celebratory posts and conservative outlets aggregated them. An anonymous activist compiled offending posts and published employment information. Right-wing media encouraged efforts to extract penalties. Within 48 hours, several people reportedly lost jobs over their reactions. These rapid retaliatory actions fueled debates about censorship, accountability, and the limits of permissible speech online.
Read at Fast Company
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]