"Well, Donald Trump's lead argument just went out the window, Kaitlan. Because, you said the key word in the intro to this show, Nonexistent. Twice in the complaint that Donald Trump brought to initiate this lawsuit, he claims the letter is nonexistent. Now we know that it is quite existent, so to speak. And it's really important, Jasmine Crockett just made this point, the way that this letter came about is relevant,"
"We now have seen it, because Congress, the House, subpoenaed it from the Epstein estate, and that's exactly where you would expect to find it, if it was as the Wall Street Journal says it was. And now, Donald Trump is falling back to argument B, which is, I didn't sign it. But you know what? Legally, that actually doesn't matter."
A 2003 birthday note to Jeffrey Epstein, framed by a crude doodle of a naked woman and a bushy signature, was released by the House Oversight Committee from materials provided by the Epstein estate. The White House and allied supporters immediately denied that the signature is genuine. The letter's public release undermines a lawsuit premised on the claim that the note did not exist, removing a central factual defense. A remaining claim of non-authorship shifts the dispute to signature authenticity and forensic examination. Legal focus will center on provenance established by the congressional subpoena and detailed handwriting analysis.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]