The article discusses Pete Hegseth's controversial leadership decisions, particularly his unproductive military escalation against the Houthis based on unverified information. Following a failed campaign that drew resources from Asia, he dismissed trusted advisors, allegedly based on dubious claims of an NSA wiretap connected to leaks. Advisors expressed alarm over the potential constitutional implications and questioned the validity of the investigation overseen by his lawyer, Tim Parlatore, which targeted those involved in the internal staff conflict. The atmosphere of distrust and infighting underscores the instability in Hegseth's administration.
Hegseth’s decisions led to a failed escalation against the Houthis, fueled by unverified claims about an NSA wiretap and infighting within his team.
The advisors voiced concern over an alleged NSA wiretap, fearing it would overshadow leaks and highlight significant constitutional violations if true.
Collection
[
|
...
]