"We're sick, we're sad, we're angry, and we're resolute, and we're going to avenge Charlie's death in the way Charlie would want it to be avenged. He was such a beautiful boy, he was an American boy, and he was incredibly positive, he was full of energy, and life, and he made politics fun,"
"And as Greg [Gutfeld] said, this hits differently, because Charlie was one of us, and Trump gets hit in the ear. Charlie gets shot dead. They came after Kavanaugh with a rifle to his neighborhood. They went after Musk's cars. They just shot two Jews outside the embassy. Think about it. Scalise got shot, barely survived. It's happening. We got trans shooters. We got riots in LA. They are at war with us! Whether we want to accept it or not, they are at war with us! And what are we gonna do about it? How much political violence are we going to tolerate? And that's the question we're just gonna have to ask ourselves,"
"This is outrageous, ridiculous rhetoric. I realize Watters is paid to be an attack dog, but this is the exact opposite of what any American committed to democracy should be saying right now."
Jesse Watters called for avenging Charlie Kirk's killing and described Kirk as a joyful, energetic American who made politics fun. Watters invoked a series of attacks and threats — including an assault on Kavanaugh's neighborhood, damage to Musk's cars, shootings targeting Jews, the Scalise shooting, alleged "trans shooters," and riots in Los Angeles — and asserted that political opponents are "at war with us." Critics condemned the rhetoric as inflammatory and dangerous amid rising political violence. Journalist James Surowiecki directly labeled the comments "outrageous, ridiculous rhetoric," saying such language undermines democratic norms.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]