The Climate Working Group and the Energy Department are inviting substantive feedback after a 30-day comment period. The recent report evaluates ongoing scientific inquiries often labeled with high confidence levels not by scientists but by political bodies. The Trump administration emphasizes a more thoughtful, science-based dialogue on climate change. Climate researcher Ben Santer critiques the report for misrepresenting his work and asserts that the authors have a history of inaccuracies in their scientific claims.
The Climate Working Group and the Energy Department look forward to engaging with substantive comments following the conclusion of the 30-day comment period, Woods wrote.
This report critically assesses many areas of ongoing scientific inquiry that are frequently assigned high levels of confidence-not by the scientists themselves but by the political bodies involved, such as the United Nations or previous Presidential administrations.
The notion that their views have been given short shrift by the scientific community is just plain wrong.
These guys have a history of being wrong on important scientific issues.
Collection
[
|
...
]