The article presents results from a user study evaluating a prototype designed for collaborative code cities. Despite achieving a high task correctness score of 90%, discussions emphasize that the study's limitations must be acknowledged. The participants provided feedback through Likert scale questionnaires and free replies, which helped identify perceived difficulty with certain tasks. The results suggest positive usability aspects, yet they are not statistically grounded, serving more as preliminary indicators for further refinements to the system.
Our user study measured task correctness at 90%, demonstrating positive insights into the efficacy of our prototype in collaborative code cities.
The findings should be considered initial insights rather than definitive conclusions, as they're confined to our specific prototype and study setup.
Collection
[
|
...
]