"We had a functioning nuclear deal with Iran. Barack Obama's probably the first person to ever earn his Nobel Peace Prize a few years after he got it. But many nations came together to form this nuclear deal with Iran and our military swore up and down for years that Iran was complying with the deal, up until the moment Donald Trump tore it up."
"What if you're wrong? And what if Iran is really, as the president indicated, on the verge of creating a shortcut to a nuclear weapon? Well imagine the surprise of all the Republicans who believed him for years when he said no more wars, no more wars."
"The one thing that, to answer Geraldo's question, I mean, we don't have a lot of actual hard evidence about this one way or another. We do have the sworn congressional testimony of the director of national intelligence who said that after we bombed their facilities last summer, they had made no efforts to constitute their nuclear capabilities."
Geraldo Rivera defended President Trump's justification for military action against Iran, challenging claims that the military had been dishonest about Iran's nuclear compliance. John Fugelsang argued that a previous nuclear deal, established under Obama, was functioning and that the military had assured compliance until Trump withdrew from the agreement. Fugelsang questioned the credibility of military claims about Iran's nuclear ambitions, suggesting that if Trump is concerned about Iran's nuclear capabilities, it implies a history of military deception. Rivera countered by asking what if Trump is correct about Iran's nuclear threat.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]