#thomson-reuters

#thomson-reuters

Generative AI dominates legal discourse, with significant public interest in its implications, products, and ethical concerns.

Scandals and corporate changes also capture attention within legal narratives.

Judicial ruling found ROSS Intelligence's AI training on Westlaw content infringes copyright.

Generative AI is widely seen as valuable for legal workflows, but its true worth and ROI remains unclear.

Quality human input is essential for quality AI output, as demonstrated by Thomson Reuters' integration of attorney-editors in AI development.

A federal judge dismissed ROSS Intelligence's antitrust claims against Thomson Reuters, citing insufficient evidence for unlawful tying practices.

The development of AI tools for legal applications is ongoing but complex, with challenges in handling large volumes of information effectively.

A judge rejected copyright infringement defenses presented by Ross Intelligence in a lawsuit by Thomson Reuters.

Thomson Reuters won a partial summary judgment against Ross Intelligence for unauthorized use of copyrighted Westlaw content.

Thomson Reuters' ruling on fair use could impact future AI copyright lawsuits, but each case has distinct nuances.

Thomson Reuters won a partial judgment against Ross Intelligence, denying fair use for AI training on copyrighted material.

Raghu Ramanathan emphasizes the need for open benchmarks on AI performance in legal assistants.

Practical Law enhances legal professionals' efficiency with expert resources and AI capabilities.