"“I always feel that against-ness breeds against-ness. AI is here. And so to fight it is to fight something that is a battle that we will lose. So to find ways in which we can work with it I think is a more valuable path to take.”"
"“She added: Are we doing enough to protect ourselves? I don't know the answer to that. And so my inclination would be to say probably not. Moore, who was last at Cannes with the body horror film The Substance, said there were beautiful aspects to being able to utilise AI but it could never replace the human experience or touch.”"
"“The truth is there really isn't anything to fear because what it can never replace is what true art comes from, which is not the physical, it comes from the soul, she said. It comes from the spirit of each and every one of us sitting here, to each and every one of us who creates every day. And that they can never recreate through something that is technical.”"
"“I don't think politics and art should be divided, said Park. It's a strange concept to think they're in conflict with each other. Just because a work of art has a political statement, it should not be considered an enemy of art. At the same time, just because a film is not making a political statement, that film should not be ignored.”"
AI is already present in the film industry, and resisting it is framed as a losing battle. Working with AI is presented as a more valuable path than fighting it. Protection and regulation are questioned, with uncertainty about whether enough safeguards exist. AI is described as having beautiful aspects, but it cannot replace the human experience or the source of true art. True art is said to come from the soul and spirit of creators, not from technical processes. Art and cinema are also positioned as not being in conflict with politics, since political statements do not make art an enemy and non-political films should not be ignored.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]