"“If these turncoats have any shred of integrity left, they should resign their seats tonight and run in a by-election tomorrow,” the paper reported Poilievre saying in a speech in March."
"“after the Times learned that a remark attributed to Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative leader, was in fact an A.I.-generated summary of his views about Canadian politics that A.I. rendered as a quotation. The reporter should have checked the accuracy of what the A.I. tool returned.”"
"“I have looked up the speeches he gave in March and can't find him saying this,” Iris wrote."
"“My personal opinion is that when a member of Parliament goes back on the word they made to their constituents and switches parties, constituents should be able to petition to throw th"
A news report attributed a political remark to Pierre Poilievre, but the attributed quote was actually an AI-generated summary of his views. The outlet later added a correction after learning that an AI tool produced the quotation without proper verification by the reporter. The error was identified by a reader who checked Poilievre’s March speeches and could not find the statement. The correction was delayed until May 1, when a different quote from an April speech replaced the earlier attributed wording. The incident underscores that AI inaccuracies can be published as fact and should be treated with the same seriousness as human fabrication to protect journalistic integrity.
Read at The Walrus
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]