"'For songs that were not removed from Spotify-curated playlists, we found no evidence of a comparable pullback in intentional listening,' said Professor Jura Liaukonyte, who led the study. 'In other words, consumption dropped not because listener preferences suddenly changed, but because the platform's discovery tools made it harder for listeners to encounter R. Kelly's music.'"
"'For me, if they are not singing about their negative beliefs or crimes then its okay,' one user wrote. Another added: 'It can be useful to know who's responsible for music sometimes, but it's not necessary for enjoying it...the music deserves to be enjoyed just for what it is, without attachments.'"
A study from Cornell University indicates that negative revelations about artists do not significantly reduce fan engagement with their music. In some instances, such as with R. Kelly, the popularity of the music can even increase despite the artist's controversies. The research found that the decline in listening was primarily due to platform restrictions rather than a change in listener preferences. The debate on separating art from the artist continues, with varied opinions on the matter among fans.
Read at Mail Online
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]