The disaster unfolding on Russia's Black Sea coast is of its own making

"In April, repeated Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil infrastructure in Tuapse triggered massive refinery fires and oil spills along the Black Sea coast, including near Sochi. Residents described black rain falling from the sky as smoke and petroleum residue spread across the region. Weeks later, wildlife is still dying, beaches remain polluted and volunteers trying to respond say their efforts have often been obstructed."

"The authorities, meanwhile, have focused less on confronting the scale of the catastrophe than on silencing those speaking out about it. Despite the ongoing environmental damage, officials are already discussing reopening the beaches and launching the tourist season. The catastrophe raises difficult questions about environmental destruction during wartime."

"Ukraine, which has experienced countless environmental catastrophes related to Russia's all-out war, has been among the leading actors advocating for the recognition of ecocide as an international crime, even though the concept has yet to be formally codified in international law. Following the April strikes, however, some environmental activists in Russia and beyond are now also accusing Ukraine of hypocrisy and causing long-term environmental harm through strikes on oil infrastructure."

"There is a real debate over whether such actions can be justified, even when targeting an aggressor, if their environmental consequences may last for decades. But focusing exclusively on Ukrainian strikes risks obscuring the deeper structural causes of the disaster. Russia's oil infrastructure is deeply embedded in its war economy, and environmental damage of this magnitude does not occur in a vacuum. It is shaped by years of deregulation"

Repeated strikes on Russian oil infrastructure in Tuapse triggered refinery fires and oil spills along the Black Sea coast, including near Sochi. Residents reported black rain as smoke and petroleum residue spread across the region. Weeks later, wildlife deaths continued, beaches remained polluted, and volunteers said their response efforts were obstructed. Authorities prioritized silencing people speaking out rather than confronting the full scale of the catastrophe. Officials discussed reopening beaches and restarting the tourist season despite ongoing damage. The disaster raises questions about environmental destruction during wartime and whether attacks on oil infrastructure can be justified when consequences may last for decades. Structural causes include Russia’s war economy dependence on oil infrastructure and years of deregulation.

Read at www.aljazeera.com