
"We used to work together. There was a falling out based on your unaccountability, privilege, and unconstructive criticism of creative types, for which you are completely incapable of doing said creative things. 5 years later, how on earth, we work at the same place."
"You worked in a different department but because you are so damn slow, and so damn lazy, you came to my department, not by earning it, but because nobody wants to work with you. You're liable to break a rib if you bend over. You take an elevator to go up 10 steps of stairs. You cost this company money. When everyone leaves early because the work is done, I have no idea how you've milked out to stay the whole day."
"Every time I see you, you are talking and not working which what you call work, is not hard at all. We've had another encounter here to which you still play the victim with no accountability. The amount of loathing I have for you is nothing compared to how I'm sure other folks feel for other certain folks. You are a perfect ass kissing example of true lazy work ethics and entitlement."
A colleague repeatedly demonstrates unaccountability, privilege, and harsh criticism of creative staff despite lacking the skills to do creative work. The colleague moved into the narrator's department without earning the role, allegedly because others refused to work with them. The colleague is described as slow, lazy, and physically fragile, using elevators for short staircases and costing the company money. The colleague reportedly stays after work without contributing, talks instead of working, and frames themselves as a victim while avoiding responsibility. The narrator expresses strong loathing and views the colleague as emblematic of entitlement and poor work ethics.
Read at Portland Mercury
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]