The article critiques the peculiar naming conventions of MLB teams, emphasizing how some names, rooted in historical context, seem outdated or vague. The author expresses particular disdain for names like 'Nationals,' arguing that they lack meaningful representation compared to more distinctive team names. The tier list provided categorizes teams into grades based on the perceived clarity and appeal of their names, shedding light on the subjective nature of team brand identities that are relevant to fans and the broader culture of baseball.
MLB team names reflect historical context, with older teams retaining names based on uniform colors, while newer names like 'Nationals' are criticized for vagueness.
Team names should be distinctive; vague concepts undermine their representation. The Mets and Nationals exemplify this issue in modern team naming.
Collection
[
|
...
]