New York City has proposed a controversial research study on pregnant individuals seeking shelter that has drawn criticism for its ethical implications. The study aims to use random assignments among three intervention groups to evaluate effective housing support methods, yet this approach raises moral concerns as it denies essential support to a vulnerable population. Given the known risks of housing insecurity during pregnancy, critics argue that the study violates ethical standards outlined in the Belmont Report, which emphasizes respect for participants, beneficence, and justice. This method not only delays necessary assistance but also endangers maternal and infant health.
Instead of providing proven systems of support to pregnant people experiencing homelessness, the city is choosing to delay help through an unnecessary study, failing to deliver what it already knows works.
The city's stated goal is to determine which intervention helps pregnant people avoid or shorten shelter stays, but the random assignment raises considerable ethical concerns.
Collection
[
|
...
]