"Wilson is very into a particular kink. I have done my best to accommodate his kink, but I truly am beginning to tire of it. He's into golden showers (giving and receiving). I get nothing out of pissing on him, and I don't enjoy being pissed on at all. When I told Wilson I no longer wanted to engage in the piss play, he became extremely upset, and things were chilly between us for a couple of days."
"In a different context, what Wilson is proposing could be considered reasonable. The way his "compromise" seems to be more of a directive than a suggestion or starting point, along with his reactions to your discomfort, though, is pretty concerning. As in, if you ever leave him, I'm worried he might turn any sex videos into "revenge porn" to get back at you."
A married couple has been together eight years, married five. The husband has a persistent kink for golden showers; the wife accommodated but now finds it tiring and refuses to participate. The husband reacted with extreme upset, then proposed filming the acts so he could masturbate to the videos; the wife objects to being recorded and was labeled inflexible and unfair. The husband's compromise appears directive rather than negotiable, raising concerns about consent, coercion, and potential misuse of recordings as revenge porn. Recording sexual activity is inadvisable unless both partners enthusiastically consent and accept distribution risks.
Read at Slate Magazine
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]