Milo's zero-calorie sweet tea, despite its ranking as the top brand in a traditional sugar variant, fell short in flavor when sugar was replaced with sucralose. The lack of authentic tea taste led to customer dissatisfaction, expressing that the drink was reminiscent of sugar water rather than real tea. Reviews reflected a common sentiment of disappointment, with many consumers critiquing the artificial taste and the drink's overall composition. While Milo's boasts affordability and size variety, it fails to deliver a satisfying zero-calorie tea experience.
One customer described Milo's zero-calorie sweet tea as "Super cheap sugar water that they pass off as tea," highlighting widespread disappointment among drinkers.
Despite its simple three-ingredient formula, Milo's zero-calorie variant suffers from a lack of tea flavor, tasting predominantly like sugar water.
Collection
[
|
...
]