"She told Ars that "users' fears are absolutely justified" and explained why the "bugs" explanation is "insufficient." "Even if these are technical glitches, the pattern of what's being suppressed reveals something significant," Literat told Ars. "When your 'bug' consistently affects anti-Trump content, Epstein references, and anti-ICE videos, you're looking at either spectacular coincidence or systems that have been designed-whether intentionally or through embedded biases-to flag and suppress specific political content.""
"TikTok users are savvy, Literat noted, and what's being cast as "paranoia" about the app's bugs actually stems from their "digital literacy," she suggested. "They've watched Instagram suppress Palestine content, they've seen Twitter's transformation under Musk, they've experienced shadow-banning and algorithmic suppression, including on TikTok prior to this," Literat said. "So, their pattern recognition isn't paranoia, but rather digital literacy.""
TikTok reported technical errors that blocked uploads of anti-ICE videos and disabled direct messages mentioning Jeffrey Epstein. The errors coincided with apparent suppression of content critical of Donald Trump after US owners assumed control. User concerns about censorship intensified and led some users to delete the app. Observers note a pattern: consistent suppression of anti-Trump content, Epstein references, and anti-ICE videos that looks unlikely to be random. The pattern suggests systems that flag or suppress specific political content, whether through deliberate design or embedded algorithmic biases. Prior platform experiences contribute to users' pattern recognition and distrust.
Read at Ars Technica
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]