"The appellate court found that Reed had improvidently exercised [his] discretion in stopping the discovery. It ultimately decided that the lower court should have been more liberal in its interpretation of the scope of necessary discovery in the Trump family dispute."
"Mary Trump alleged that President Trump induced her to sign the settlement agreement at the heart of this lawsuit by fraudulently valuing it. Under New York law, a fraudulent agreement should render the contract's provisions null and void."
A Manhattan Appellate Court granted Mary Trump the ability to defend herself against a lawsuit initiated by President Trump over a confidentiality agreement. The lawsuit, filed in 2021, claimed she breached the agreement by providing financial documents to the New York Times. Mary Trump alleged that the agreement was induced by fraudulent valuation. The appellate court reversed a previous decision, stating that the lower court should have allowed more discovery to support her defense. The court emphasized the necessity of the requested materials for establishing her affirmative defense.
Read at www.amny.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]