Remote Work Boom Sparks Industry Call for Clearer Tax Rules

"Tax professionals are calling for more consistency in global tax rules covering remote workers, saying the current patchwork of approaches across jurisdictions is causing big headaches for multinational companies. The OECD has been working on new guidance on workforce mobility and launched a consultation in November asking for stakeholder feedback. In their comments, practitioners and business groups detailed tax issues they want addressed by the organization, such as when a worker's presence in a country makes a company's business there taxable or what a high-level executive working overseas can mean for a company's transfer pricing positions."

"Remote worker issues "are often not driven by problems with current international tax principles, but by uncertainty and often administrative complexity in their application to new mobility patterns," CFE Tax Advisers Europe said in a letter to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Remote working hits a broad range of tax issues, the group said, including around the creation of permanent establishments-which happen when a company's business activities go beyond mere ancillary services and create a taxable presence in a country."

"The designation also subjects the corporate entity to transfer pricing rules, which require companies to price transactions between their related entities as if they were between independent parties. "In some jurisdictions, the mere presence of an employee may immediately create a taxable presence," the National Foreign Trade Council wrote in its letter. Other jurisdictions require a much higher level of activity. "This uncertainty is compounded where payroll reporting, withholding, and social tax obligations are triggered independently of whether a permanent establishment exists," the NFTC said."

International tax rules for remote workers vary widely across jurisdictions, creating uncertainty and administrative complexity for multinational companies. The OECD is developing guidance on workforce mobility and solicited stakeholder feedback to address issues around taxability and transfer pricing. Determinations of permanent establishment differ, with some countries treating mere employee presence as sufficient while others require more substantial activity. Permanent establishments trigger corporate tax and transfer pricing obligations, requiring related-party transactions to be priced as if between independent entities. Movement of senior executives and board members further complicates transfer pricing analyses. Payroll reporting, withholding, and social tax obligations can be triggered independently of permanent establishment status.

Read at Bloomberglaw