#scientific-integrity

#scientific-integrity

The Trump administration's cuts to federal advisory committees undermine informed decision-making and scientific integrity in governance.

Trump administration accused of undermining U.S. science, imperiling research and public health through funding cuts and layoffs.

The U.S. attorney's letter to CHEST journal raises concerns regarding editorial partisanship and the potential impact on scientific integrity.

NIH has rescinded a scientific integrity policy to align with new federal priorities, raising concerns about political influence over research.

The initial policy emphasized diversity and inclusion, vital for equitable scientific participation, which is absent in the new directive.

NIH is being sued over $2.4 billion in canceled grants affecting research and patient care, as plaintiffs argue it jeopardizes scientific advancement.

Eliminating the Office of Research and Development could severely impact environmental regulations and the EPA's scientific integrity.

EPA scientists faced pressure to misrepresent chemical safety, leading to retaliation and serious implications for public health.

The United States' biomedical research, fueled by NIH funding, faces ideological attacks that threaten its integrity and contributions to scientific diversity.

Science diplomacy is crucial for international cooperation, but its integrity is threatened by political interference.

Pressure to publish significantly contributes to the perceived reproducibility crisis in biomedical research.

About 4% of the most cited researchers have at least one retraction, highlighting the complexities of scientific integrity.

The peer review process is crucial to ensuring the quality and integrity of psychological research.

The Trump administration retaliated against scientists defending climate research, leading to several leaving federal service, but some, like Dr. Burkett, were reinstated under Biden.

Scientists express concerns over potential negative impacts on research due to Trump's reelection, especially regarding climate change and public health.

Low-cost mental healthcare initiatives are emerging in Africa.

Climate change is intensifying hurricanes and their effects on communities.

Scientific integrity issues were raised by the Ranga Dias case.

Anticipation significantly enhances animals' pleasure.

A controversial COVID study has been retracted after four years, emphasizing the importance of rigorous scientific integrity.

The retraction of the hydroxychloroquine study emphasizes the need for ethical standards in scientific research.

Political divisions in the U.S. are fueled by group identity and media echo chambers.

Ranga Dias was terminated from the University of Rochester following an investigation into research misconduct related to retracted superconductivity papers.

Researcher Ranga Dias, known for a room-temperature superconductor claim, has left the University of Rochester due to research misconduct allegations.