"Prof William Webster stated that the slow pace of legislation is trying to catch up with the real world, indicating that the horse has gone before the cart in terms of technology and regulation."
"Dr Brian Plastow warned that the technology is nowhere near as effective as police claims suggest, highlighting a patchwork legal framework throughout the UK that lacks consistency and accountability."
"Members of the public have expressed frustration over being wrongly labeled as suspected criminals by AI cameras, stating there is no accountability or recourse to complain, which leaves them feeling guilty until proven innocent."
"Critics of the technology argue that it represents Big Brother-style mass surveillance, posing significant risks to civil liberties and data privacy, despite claims from police and retailers that it enhances public safety."
Britain's biometrics watchdogs have expressed concerns over the slow legislative response to the rapid growth of AI-powered facial recognition technology. The Metropolitan police have significantly increased the number of faces scanned, while retailers also adopt this technology. Watchdogs emphasize the need for new laws to regulate police use of live facial recognition and to establish accountability. Critics argue that the current oversight is inadequate, leading to potential misuse and civil liberties violations, with individuals feeling unjustly accused by AI systems without recourse.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]