"When a CFO initiates a new training development project, optimism fills the air. L&D is excited about the upcoming project and the opportunity to solve skill or knowledge gaps, while the CFO hopes their vision will be transferred into learning that supports business goals with maximum return on investment."
"Training is often treated as a separate support function rather than a key driver of business performance. The C-suite expects quick results in line with the set business goals, while L&D prioritizes learning experiences and engagement metrics."
"The dynamic becomes unbalanced: business strategic alignment is nonexistent. The C-suite starts to question the real value of L&D."
C-suite and L&D partnerships often face challenges due to differing expectations and priorities. Initial excitement can fade as the C-suite seeks quick results aligned with business goals, while L&D focuses on learning experiences and engagement. This misalignment can lead to questioning the value of L&D. Successful partnerships require mutual interest and understanding of each party's roles to avoid disappointment and foster effective training development that supports overall business performance.
Read at eLearning Industry
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]