"This is significant. It's the first time since COVID that they've adjusted our outlook from stable to negative. There is a problem here, and it's very simple: We are spending more money than we're taking in in New York City, and we are proposing currently to drain our reserve funds to cover that. This was a red flag to Moody's, that's why they spoke out."
"The negative outlook from the agencies is a warning: The next step could be a downgrade of the city's bond rating, which would raise the cost of borrowing money for routine city operations."
"Mamdani can't afford a scorched-earth confrontation with business leaders who ultimately control the terms of access to the municipal bond markets, where New York mayors borrow the cash that allows the city to function."
New York City's bond-rating agencies Moody's and S&P Global Ratings issued warnings about the city's financial trajectory. Moody's changed its outlook from stable to negative, while S&P Global questioned the sustainability of budgetary balance beyond 2026-2027. City Comptroller Mark Levine identified the core issue: the city spends more than it receives and proposes draining reserve funds to cover the deficit. Mayor Mamdani contested the decision as premature, noting the city's overall credit rating remains strong. However, the agencies' message is clear—without adopting more fiscally conservative policies, the city faces potential bond rating downgrades that would increase borrowing costs for municipal operations.
Read at Intelligencer
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]