Bringing Back the Presidential Fitness Test Is a Good Idea. There's Just One Problem.
Briefly

The reintroduction of the Presidential Fitness Test by Donald Trump aims to rekindle an emphasis on children's physical fitness. Originally launched in the 1960s, the test includes a variety of exercises that assess strength, endurance, and flexibility but was paused during the Obama administration. Personal experiences reflect its duality; while some view it with dread, others find opportunities for identity and belonging. A fast runner in school, a participant reflects on the significance of finding their niche and how such experiences shape self-worth and passion in sports.
Growing up, I loved sports but hadn't found one to call my own. I was too skinny for football, not quite coordinated enough for baseball, and not tall enough for basketball. So when my second grade P.E. teacher, Mrs. Passmore, lined us up for 16 daunting laps around a makeshift dirt track, I wasn't sure what to expect. A little less than seven minutes later, completely and utterly exhausted, I had two thoughts: That was hard and I'm really good at it.
Our younger school years are a quest for significance and belonging. We are trying to find our spot. Some kids find their place as a math whiz or a great singer. For me, it was as a fast runner. That sliver of security in my identity ignited a passion.
This week, Donald Trump reintroduced the Presidential Fitness Test. Originally launched in the 1960s and put on ice during the Obama administration, it included a series of exercises designed to test a kid's strength, endurance, and flexibility.
But for others, like myself, it represented a chance. For many, the test evokes memories of dread and humiliation.
Read at Slate Magazine
[
|
]