ICE's inability to verify claims made by a deported migrant highlights flaws in both their processing and decision-making regarding deportations, raising questions about their procedures.
On the foundation's decision to seek a judicial review, lead counsel Phil Bradley-Schmieg stated: "We are taking action now to protect Wikipedia's volunteer users, as well as the global accessibility and integrity of free knowledge."
Strunsky highlighted that the investigative report's reliance on uncorroborated claims from anonymous sources severely undermines its credibility and objectivity, raising concerns about its findings.
Shabana Mahmood has expressed strong concern regarding the Sentencing Council's guidelines, asserting that differential treatment based on ethnicity undermines the principle of equal treatment under the law.
The Tenth Circuit's extreme deference to arbitrators has nullified meaningful judicial review, as emphasized in the amicus brief by Lift Our Voices. The brief cites the court's admissions of powerlessness, claiming federal courts "do not have discretion," "do not have power," and "cannot set aside an arbitration award based on legal error." This language reflects a worrying abdication of judicial authority outlined in Article III when the Federal Arbitration Act was enacted.
"This unprecedented increase in government roles raises serious concerns about whether such appointments are genuinely reflective of democratic principles and equality in representation."
Justice Shaun O'Brien criticized the OPP's reasoning, stating, "It will not be readily apparent to many members of the public how police misconduct causing death is not considered serious." This underscores the need for transparency and accountability in police conduct, especially in incidents resulting in fatalities.